Blog
Sniffer Dogs and Drones: Canada Flexes Drug Enforcement Muscle in Appeal to Trump
Canada is trading its usual restraint for American-style boldness in an effort to prove to US President Donald Trump that it’s serious about strengthening the border as it tries to avert tariffs.
Soft language is out. Photos and videos of police, border agents and helicopters are in. Official communications now evoke strength and power through phrases like “strike force,” “Operation Blizzard” and “fentanyl czar.”
Read More: Trump’s Tariff Convulsions Are Wreaking Havoc on Tequila Makers
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has amped up his rhetoric about drug trafficking. “The scourge of fentanyl must be wiped from the face of the Earth, its production must be shut down, and its profiteers must be punished,” he said on Feb. 11. The word “scourge” is also one favored by Trump to describe a drug that has killed hundreds of thousands of people in the two countries.
Trump signed an executive order on Feb. 1 to put 25% tariffs against most Canadian products, saying the US’s northern neighbor was allowing too much fentanyl to go over the border. Those levies are scheduled to go into effect March 4 after the president said this week that drugs are still entering “at very high and unacceptable levels.”
Canadian officials say that’s simply not true — and they point to US government data showing that American border agents have found very little fentanyl coming from the north. But taking no chances, they’re also trying to put their enforcement efforts on public display.
Over the past week alone, news releases regarding the drug appeared at least five times from different Canadian government departments.
The show of brawn — including some attention-grabbing scenes like Public Safety Minister David McGuinty next to drug-sniffing dogs — is directed at a president who’s looking to prove to Americans he’s forcing action on the fentanyl crisis from the countries that border his own.
The available evidence suggests that Canada is not a significant exporter of the drug to the US, so it has little ability to impact a key metric outlined by Trump: American overdose deaths.
That makes border optics all the more important.
“With Trump, it’s all about theatrics. Words and numbers aren’t enough. He wants to see highly visible, dramatic signs of actions,” said Fen Hampson, an international affairs professor at Carleton University in Ottawa. He views Canadian efforts so far as insufficient.
“Despite the fact we have a prime minister who was a drama teacher, there’s not enough drama. We need a lot more theater at the border — putting guys in uniforms with guns,” he said.
Trump’s tariff threats have prompted Canada and Mexico to announce specific measures. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaumvowed to send 10,000 National Guard officers to the border. Trudeau unveiled a C$1.3 billion ($899 million) border security plan that included new helicopters and drones, and also beefed up the number of personnel — though not soldiers — to monitor crossings.
Complaints by Trump and his officials about the Canadian border are “a complete con,” said Wesley Wark, a former adviser to two Canadian prime ministers on national security issues and a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation.
“No border is perfect. There was never any intention to create a Berlin Wall between Canada and the United States,” Wark added. “But the notion that the Canadian border is a security problem for the United States is complete nonsense. And the statistics and evidence don’t bear it out.”
Despite the billion-dollar price tag, some view Canada’s efforts so far as a media blitz lacking in substance. Ross McKitrick, economics professor at University of Guelph in Ontario, said the government’s focus looks like public relations rather than a serious effort to engage in full border surveillance.